disqus 3

This is not likely a false flag, because the operatives were killed in a suicide operation, so they needed to be brainwashed young people, not seasoned intelligence agency people. They were likely receiving orders via internet, and getting supplies, guns and suicide vests, from couriers, and only needed to meet up on the day of the attack. France seems to have been immune to such false flags in the past. While ISIS is a Western and Saudi creation, once it acquired independent sources of financing through looting ancient art and oil production, it seems to have a life of its own, and it can no longer be controlled. This attack is probably what people are saying. That is not to say that past events, the ones between 2000 and 2010 are as they seem, those are clearly false flags, as they have reported drills associated to them, in ways that are statistically impossible. I doubt very much there were any drills in Paris on Friday.

EDIT: It seems I was wrong about drills--- there was at least one drill involving medical personnel that leaked. It could be an inside job, but then there is probably exactly one way to do it: have one "hostage taking" drill involving three stupid agents who are killed, and have additional agents shoot the theater and the original agents who take the hostages, killing them. The bombs are easy to do with drills too, same as the Boston Bombing. One just has to wait to see if any French leaks about drills come out in the next few weeks.




When I first turned on the TV to watch CNN and Fox News cover the Paris attacks I quickly became aware of two things:

1. I was looking for footage that would be undeniable that an attack actually took place. I saw plenty of emergency personnel and law enforcement and their vehicles and later a few bodies laying in the street with either a sheet over them or a couple people with blood on them which is not by any means conclusive evidence since we saw bloodied "victims" during the Boston Bombing. Also, we heard the shots in the distance at the concert hall - that could've been faked as well.

2. I listened to hours of Shepard Smith reading as if from a script what different "victims" or "witnesses" were saying as he was being fed information. The coverage as to actual victims speaking just wasn't evident. It seemed so contrived to me. Anyone can write a story line inserting so-called real victims or witnesses. I couldn't help but think that maybe they decided the crisis actors would be better served lying on the ground covered with sheets rather than actually having them talk on camera and risk being exposed as frauds, which has happened with other staged events.

I don't know if anyone was actually killed or this was purely a staged event. What I would like to know is what the people in Paris actually saw, if anything.




Does this mean that there isn't any such thing as radical Islamic terrorism? Is it ALL perpetrated by the West, or is some of it "real?"




It is reported that 129 victims died in Paris. And 352 were wounded. People claiming these are all crisis actors should present some evidence to that effect. Because we had a faked 911 does not mean that all muslim terror attacks are faked. Here in Copenhagen we had 2 killed in January. One at the synagoge and the other at a meeting with swedish artist Lars Wilks. I should have attended the last, but I could not attend because my wife had invited guests. Yours, Ole Gerstrom, Copenhagen, Denmark.